38 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2000 Last revised: 27 Dec 2013
Date Written: January 1, 2000
Many law professors (Posner, Dworkin, Finnis, Nussbaum, etc.) spend a lot of time these days talking about "morality." The penetration of legal discourse by moral discourse is not surprising. Moral controversy, after all, is often at the center of legal controversy. Nonetheless, it is often obscure what we citizens of the legal academy, and others, are talking about -- and often clear that we are not all talking about the same thing -- when we talk (argue) about "morality." Using Richard Posner's conception of "morality" in his book, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory (1999), as a point of departure, Professor Perry addresses the question that is the title of his essay "What is 'Morality' Anyway?" He sketches the three fundamental questions -- or sets of questions -- that constitute the heart of "moral" inquiry and argument.
JEL Classification: K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Perry, Michael J., Giannella Lecture: What Is 'Morality' Anyway? (January 1, 2000). Villanova Law Review, Vol. 45, pp. 69-105, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=208673 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.208673