Business and Society (doi: 10.1177/0007650312462666), Forthcoming
56 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2012 Last revised: 13 Feb 2013
Date Written: May 9, 2012
Globalization arguably generated a governance gap that is being filled by transnational rule-making involving private actors among others. The democratic legitimacy of such new forms of governance beyond nation states is sometimes questioned. Apart from nation-centered democracies, such governance cannot build, for example, on representation and voting procedures to convey legitimacy to the generated rules. Instead, alternative elements of democracy such as deliberation and inclusion require discussion to assess new instruments of governance. The recently published standard ISO 26000 is an interesting example of transnational governance. ISO 26000 was developed in a lengthy multi-organizational process for the purpose of giving guidance on the social responsibility of organizations. By assessing the specific case of ISO 26000, this study sheds light on the question of how legitimacy beyond nation-state democracy is ensured or constricted. Centering on the idea of deliberate democracy and democratic legitimacy, the study offers in-depth insights on the normative legitimacy of the development process of ISO 26000. Positioned on the interface of business studies and public policy, this article contributes to the academic literature on transnational governance and on the role of multi-stakeholder processes in shaping the role of business in society.
Keywords: standardization, transnational governance, organizational responsibility, ISO 26000, legitimacy, deliberative democracy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hahn, Rüdiger and Weidtmann, Christian, Transnational Governance, Deliberative Democracy, and the Legitimacy of ISO 26000: Analyzing the Case of a Global Multi-Stakeholder Process (May 9, 2012). Business and Society (doi: 10.1177/0007650312462666), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2088803 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2088803