Paris School of Economics Working Paper No. 2012-29
38 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2012
Date Written: June 18, 2012
Journals favor rejections of the null hypothesis. This selection upon results may distort the behavior of researchers. Using 50,000 tests published between 2005 and 2011 in the AER, JPE and QJE, we identify a residual in the distribution of tests that cannot be explained by selection. The distribution of p-values exhibits a camel shape with abundant p-values above .25, a valley between .25 and .10 and a bump slightly under .05. Missing tests are those which would have been accepted but close to being rejected (p-values between .25 and .10). We show that this pattern corresponds to a shift in the distribution of p-values: between 10% and 20% of marginally rejected tests are misallocated. Our interpretation is that researchers might be tempted to inflate the value of their tests by choosing the specification that provides the highest statistics. Note that Inflation is larger in articles where stars are used in order to highlight statistical significance and lower in articles with theoretical models.
Keywords: Hypothesis testing, distorting incentives, selection bias, research in economics
JEL Classification: A11, B41, C13, C44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Brodeur, Abel and LÉ, Mathias and Sangnier, Marc and Zylberberg, Yanos, Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back (June 18, 2012). Paris School of Economics Working Paper No. 2012-29. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2089580 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2089580