30 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2012 Last revised: 5 Jun 2013
Date Written: August 17, 2012
In the last three decades, the field of transitional justice has moved from the margins to the center of international attention and policy making. Some two decades after the term was coined, it has been normalized, institutionalized, and mainstreamed. Yet even as the field as a whole moves from the periphery to the center, embraced by global institutions like the United Nations, issues that have long lingered at the edges of the field itself remain little changed. Thus, for example, transitional justice continues to privilege civil and political rights over economic and social rights; international rules and standards over local and cultural norms and practices; and legal and technocratic solutions over political and contextual ones. Building upon Ruti Teitel’s notion of a “transitional justice genealogy,” this article argues that a new phase or “fourth generation” of transitional justice preoccupations has arisen, characterized in part by an increasing willingness to grapple with those issues that have historically sat at the periphery of transitional justice concern. While these concerns are not entirely new, they have taken on increasing prominence in recent years. Working through the dilemmas they raise at the level of theory, policy, and practice will be an important step in the development of the field of transitional justice in the years to come.
Keywords: transitional justice, peacebuilding, critical legal studies, economic and social rights, economic justice, local justice
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sharp, Dustin N., Interrogating the Peripheries: The Preoccupations of Fourth Generation Transitional Justice (August 17, 2012). 26 Harvard Human Rights Journal 149 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2093452