Three Theories of Copyright in Ratings

James Grimmelmann

Cornell Law School; Cornell Tech

May 19, 2012

14 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 851 (2012)
NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No.. 12/13 #44

Are ratings copyrightable? The answer depends on what ratings are. As a history of copyright in ratings shows, some courts treat them as unoriginal facts, some treat them as creative opinions, and some treat them as troubling self-fulfilling prophecies. The push and pull among these three theories explains why ratings are such a difficult boundary case for copyright, both doctrinally and theoretically. The fact-opinion tension creates a perverse incentive for raters: the less useful a rating, the more copyrightable it looks. Self-fulfilling ratings are the most troubling of all: copyright’s usual balance between incentives and access becomes indeterminate when ratings shape reality, rather than vice versa. All three theories are necessary for a complete understanding of ratings.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: copyright, ratings, rankings, fact/opinion

JEL Classification: K00

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Grimmelmann, James, Three Theories of Copyright in Ratings (May 19, 2012). 14 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 851 (2012); NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No.. 12/13 #44. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2094523

Contact Information

James Grimmelmann (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Cornell Tech ( email )
111 8th Avenue #302
New York, NY 10011
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,109
Downloads: 182
Download Rank: 131,007
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper