A Constitutional Crisis in a Teacup: The Supremacy of EC Law in Ireland

8 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2012

See all articles by Elaine Fahey

Elaine Fahey

City, University of London - City Law School

Date Written: 2009


The recent decision of the Irish High Court in Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform & Commissioner of An Garda Siochana v. Director of Equality Tribunal might at fi rst glance appear as the unlikely source of a constitutional crisis. In fact, however, the decision may represent the most recent instance of a threat to the supremacy of European Community (EC) law in Ireland, or at the least, a decision of extraordinary incongruity to litigants seeking to rely upon EC law. The decision of J. Charleton concerned a ‘Henry VIII’ clause, whereby secondary legislation had the effect of amending primary legislation, similar to the famous ‘Metric Martyrs’ case in the United Kingdom. In proceedings before the Irish Equality Tribunal the subject of judicial review proceedings before Charleton, a confl ict arose between primary and secondary legislation, raising the question as to whether the Tribunal was entitled in effect to set aside a statutory instrument, by virtue of the operation of EC law. A complicating factor in the case is the interpretation by Charleton of a recent decision of the Court of Justice on the powers of quasi-judicial bodies to apply the doctrine of direct effect, but not supremacy, resulting in what is suggested here to be a most incongruous outcome.

Suggested Citation

Fahey, Elaine, A Constitutional Crisis in a Teacup: The Supremacy of EC Law in Ireland (2009). European Public Law, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2096175

Elaine Fahey (Contact Author)

City, University of London - City Law School ( email )

Northampton Square
London, London EC1V OHB
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics