Hysteresis Bands, Holding Period and Transaction Costs
54 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2012
Date Written: June 30, 2012
Abstract
In the presence of transactions costs, no matter how small, arbitrage activity does not necessarily render equal all riskless rates of return. When two such rates follow stochastic processes, it is not optimal immediately to arbitrage out any discrepancy that arises between them. The reason is that immediate arbitrage would induce a de finite expenditure of transactions costs whereas, without arbitrage intervention, there exists some, perhaps sufficient, probability that these two interest rates will come back together without any costs having been incurred. Hence, one can surmise that at equilibrium the financial market will permit the coexistence of two riskless rates that are not equal to each other. For analogous reasons, randomly fluctuating expected rates of return on risky assets will be allowed to differ even after correction for risk, leading to important violations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. The combination of randomness in expected rates of return and proportional transactions costs is a serious blow to existing frictionless pricing models.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consumption and Portfolio Decisions When Expected Returns are Time Varying
By John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira
-
On the Predictability of Stock Returns: An Asset-Allocation Perspective
-
Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds?
By John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira
-
Who Should Buy Long-Term Bonds?
By John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira
-
A Multivariate Model of Strategic Asset Allocation
By John Y. Campbell, Yeung Lewis Chan, ...
-
A Multivariate Model of Strategic Asset Allocation
By John Y. Campbell, Yeung Lewis Chan, ...
-
Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Stochastic Volatility in Incomplete Markets
By George Chacko and Luis M. Viceira
-
Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Stochastic Volatility in Incomplete Markets
By George Chacko and Luis M. Viceira