The European Takeover Directive: A US Comparison

Posted: 3 Jul 2012 Last revised: 14 Jul 2012

See all articles by Celia Taylor

Celia Taylor

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 3, 2012


Although the corporate laws of the United States and the European Union have converged in recent decades, their respective laws regulating takeovers remain quite dissimilar. Under US law, directors have almost unfettered power in the takeover context and can implement powerful defenses to deter bidders. The broad grant of authority to US directors is diametrically opposite to the approach taken by the Takeover Directive due to the inclusion of, among other provision, the board neutrality rule. The difference in approach towards takeover regulation reflects philosophical differences about how to regulate the market for corporate control and how to define the interest of the company, and may have implications for the role of corporations in sustainable development. This paper describes in broad overview the US approach toward takeover regulation highlighting differences in approach between US law and the Takeover Directive. It suggests that US law allows but does not require directors to define company interest expansively so as to support the goal of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

Taylor, Celia, The European Takeover Directive: A US Comparison (July 3, 2012). University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2012-20, Available at SSRN:

Celia Taylor (Contact Author)

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics