Therapeutic Jurisprudence’s Challenge to the Judiciary

(2011) 1 Alaska Journal of Dispute Resolution 1

Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011/2

24 Pages Posted: 5 Jul 2012 Last revised: 20 Aug 2013

See all articles by Michael S. King

Michael S. King

Monash University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

Therapeutic jurisprudence offers judges techniques and principles that promote the attainment of therapeutic outcomes such as the resolution of underlying issues associated with legal problems. These techniques and principles also equip judges to perform their daily technical functions concerning the conduct of the court and the gathering and interpretation of evidence and delivery of judgment more effectively. Misconceptions concerning the nature and application of therapeutic jurisprudence have hindered the wider adoption of therapeutic jurisprudence by the judiciary. Through the exploration of therapeutic jurisprudence and the sharing of the experience of using therapeutic jurisprudence techniques, judges have the ability to contribute to the development of therapeutic jurisprudence and to best practice in judging.

Keywords: therapeutic jurisprudence, judges, court, offenders, psychology, rehabilitation, problem-solving courts, sentencing, drug courts

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K14,K19

Suggested Citation

King, Michael S., Therapeutic Jurisprudence’s Challenge to the Judiciary (2011). (2011) 1 Alaska Journal of Dispute Resolution 1, Monash University Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011/2, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2100632

Michael S. King (Contact Author)

Monash University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Wellington Road
Clayton, Victoria 3800
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
267
Abstract Views
1,147
rank
156,839
PlumX Metrics