Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Frame the Role of Emotion in Health Policymaking

Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 5, 2012

30 Pages Posted: 7 Jul 2012

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

Therapeutic jurisprudence (“TJ”) is growing in prominence as a reappraisal of law and the legal process. It seeks to reframe law by offering a prism through which it can be viewed as a healing agent, to enhance the positive consequences of legal intervention, or at least to mitigate its more harmful effects.1 The aim of this article is twofold: (1) to briefly outline the evolution of therapeutic jurisprudence, and discuss the prominence of evidence-based/evidence-informed healthcare policymaking; and, more specifically, (2) to use a TJ-informed framework to investigate the role of emotion (as evidence, or impact on evidence) in the development, implementation, and evaluation of health policy. The intent is not to identify the right policy in any given case; rather, it is to utilize framing questions to better understand how emotion impacts policy and policymaking with an eye toward enhancing therapeutic consequences.

Keywords: therapeutic jurisprudence, health policy, emotion

Suggested Citation

Campbell, Amy T., Using Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Frame the Role of Emotion in Health Policymaking (2012). Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 5, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2101744

Amy T. Campbell (Contact Author)

UIC John Marshall Law School ( email )

300 S. State Street
Chicago, IL 60604
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
724
rank
403,829
PlumX Metrics