Federal Adoption, Equitable Sharing and Federalism

22 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2012 Last revised: 10 Mar 2017

See all articles by Brent Skorup

Brent Skorup

George Mason University - Mercatus Center

Date Written: May 14, 2012


Federal and state civil asset forfeiture laws permit law enforcement agencies to seize and forfeit property that is “guilty” of being used in the commission of a crime and remit the proceeds to their own budgets. To incentivize state and local police to enforce federal drug laws in accordance with congressional wishes, the Department of Justice has formulated a forfeiture disbursement scheme to local police departments involving so-called adoption and equitable sharing. Equitable sharing represents several threats to federalism and the abilities of state legislatures to direct and implement law enforcement policies. The end result is that state and local police departments may act against the interests of their state legislatures and become de facto federal agents in the war on drugs. This paper explores these threats to federalism posed by adoption and equitable sharing and explores some possible solutions.

Keywords: federalism, equitable sharing, adoption, constitutional law, state legislatures, war on drugs, police, law enforcement

Suggested Citation

Skorup, Brent, Federal Adoption, Equitable Sharing and Federalism (May 14, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2102090 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2102090

Brent Skorup (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Mercatus Center ( email )

3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics