Emergency Liquidity Provision to Public Banks: Rules Versus Discretion
24 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2012
Date Written: April 10, 2012
Abstract
This paper analyzes a government's incentives to provide financial assistance to a public bank which is hit by a liquidity shock. We show that discretionary decisions about emergency liquidity assistance result in either excessively small or excessively large liquidity injections in a wide variety of circumstances. Also, adding a lender of last resort does not generally ensure a socially optimal policy. However, optimal rules exist that align the government's preferences with social preferences by either subsidizing or taxing liquidity aid.
Keywords: Public banking, liquidity crises, lender of last resort, central bank, deposit insurance, forbearance
JEL Classification: G21, G28, L32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Common (Stock) Sense about Risk-Shifting and Bank Bailouts
By Linus Wilson and Yan Wendy Wu
-
Debt Overhang and Bank Bailouts
By Linus Wilson
-
Debt Overhang and Bank Bailouts
By Linus Wilson
-
The Put Problem with Buying Toxic Assets
By Linus Wilson
-
By Linus Wilson
-
A Binomial Model of Geithner’s Toxic Asset Plan
By Linus Wilson
-
By Linus Wilson
-
Taking TARP Funds Can Be Hazardous to Your Bank's Wealth
By Dan J. Jordan, Douglas Rice, ...
-
Valuing the First Negotiated Repurchase of the TARP Warrants
By Linus Wilson
-
By Linus Wilson and Yan Wendy Wu