Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2103317
 
 

References (22)



 


 



Towards a Modest Legal Moralism


R. A. Duff


University of Minnesota Law School; University of Stirling - Department of Philosophy

2012

Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 8, 2013
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-28

Abstract:     
After distinguishing different types of Legal Moralism (positive/negative; modest/ ambitious) I defend a modest, positive Legal Moralism: we have good reason to criminalize a type of conduct if and only if it constitutes a public wrong. Some of the central elements of the argument will be: the need to begin not (as many Legal Moralists begin) with the entire realm of moral wrongdoing, but with conduct falling within the public realm of civic life; the significance of the various different processes of criminalization (of which legislation is only one); and the need to attend to the relationship between criminal law and other modes of legal regulation. Criminal law focuses on wrongs: it identifies a set of public wrongs, and provides for those accused of committing such wrongs to be called to formal public account.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Legal Moralism, processes of criminalization, public wrongs, the public realm


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 10, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Duff, R. A., Towards a Modest Legal Moralism (2012). Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 8, 2013; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-28. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2103317

Contact Information

Robin Antony Duff (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

University of Stirling - Department of Philosophy ( email )
Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,141
Downloads: 283
Download Rank: 81,960
References:  22