Nobody’s Perfect (Not Even Close): Reevaluating Access to Justice in the United States and Western Europe

61 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2012 Last revised: 19 Mar 2014

See all articles by Lua K. Yuille

Lua K. Yuille

University of Kansas School of Law

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

The promise of equal access to justice for the rich and poor alike has been one of the most serious challenges facing liberal democracies during the last century. Critics of the American approach to legal aid for the poor advocate the adoption of Western European models. At the same time, Western European nations confront serious difficulties in maintaining those models, which have met with the disapproval of European critics. An unbiased evaluation of popular schemes in the United States and Western Europe reveals that critiques of both systems are correct: no model of access to justice currently in place is perfect. However, by borrowing from the best of the American scheme (its breadth) and the best of the Western European schemes (their high level of government commitment) an ideal access to justice system can be developed.

Keywords: Access to Justice, Pro Bono, Legal Aide, US, Western Europe, Indigent Representation, Gideon

Suggested Citation

Yuille, Lua Kamal, Nobody’s Perfect (Not Even Close): Reevaluating Access to Justice in the United States and Western Europe (2004). Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2103336

Lua Kamal Yuille (Contact Author)

University of Kansas School of Law ( email )

Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
252
PlumX Metrics