Strategic Retirement in Comparative Perspective

31 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2012 Last revised: 15 Aug 2012

See all articles by Aníbal Pérez Liñán

Aníbal Pérez Liñán

University of Notre Dame

Ignacio Arana

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: 2012


Studies of the US Supreme Court debate whether justices time their retirement strategically to allow for the nomination of like-minded judges. Does this practice reflect a widespread behavioral regularity or is it just idiosyncratic to the US case? We develop a formal model of strategic retirement and test it with empirical evidence for Supreme Court members in six countries (the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Panama) between 1900 and 2005. This sample of countries allows us to hold some contextual variables constant (e.g., an important role of the president in the selection process) while observing variance in others (political instability and judicial career paths). We show that career ambitions and future expectations about politics, more than ideological concerns, drive the justices’ decisions.

Keywords: Supreme Court, strategic retirement, mandatory retirement, progressive ambition

Suggested Citation

Pérez Liñán, Aníbal and Arana, Ignacio, Strategic Retirement in Comparative Perspective (2012). APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN:

Aníbal Pérez Liñán (Contact Author)

University of Notre Dame

Department of Political Science
2060 Jenkins Nanovic Halls
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States

Ignacio Arana

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

No Address Available

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics