Do Selection Rules Affect Leader Responsiveness? Evidence from Rural Uganda

40 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2012 Last revised: 8 Apr 2013

Date Written: January 19, 2013


Community organizations in developing countries often suffer from self-serving local elites. This study examines whether the responsiveness of local leaders to community members can be strengthened through more inclusive and participatory rules. To address identification problems, I take advantage of a project implementation error that resulted in exogenous variation in the rules for selecting leaders of farmer associations in Uganda. I find that compared to appointed leaders, directly elected leaders are significantly more responsive to group members, leading to higher levels of cooperation. Analyzing possible mechanisms, I find that community organizations using appointments are less likely to develop monitoring institutions and auditing practices that are vital for constraining the behavior of local elites. Unique social network data provides evidence that close friendship ties between appointed and appointees substitute for formal monitoring institutions, leading to loss of confidence by community members and, subsequently, to a decline in public goods contributions.

Keywords: Community Driven Development; Accountability, Political Institutions, Africa

Suggested Citation

Grossman, Guy, Do Selection Rules Affect Leader Responsiveness? Evidence from Rural Uganda (January 19, 2013). Working Paper. Available at SSRN:

Guy Grossman (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania ( email )

133 S. 36th Street
Perelman Center for Political Science and Economic
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
(215) 898-4209 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics