36 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2012 Last revised: 14 Aug 2015
Date Written: July 31, 2013
Previous literature documents that executives tend to cash out equity incentives when equity-linked compensation vests. Such a behavior destroys long-term incentives and hence is costly to outside shareholders. It is recommended that the unloading of incentives can be limited when the firm adopts a minimum executive shareholding policy. In this paper we provide the first evidence on the effectiveness of such policies. We find that the policies have a very limited effect on managerial behavior. They do not encourage larger retention of shares acquired from exercised options and from vested performance shares but somewhat increase share accumulation through other channels, for example open market purchases. We identify factors in the design and enforcement of the policies that improve their effectiveness. We also show that the lack of compliance with the policy has potentially important economic implications in the form of weaker firm performance and lower valuations. Our results have implications for the debate on executive remuneration regulations and practices.
Keywords: Equity-linked pay, rebalancing, minimum shareholding policies
JEL Classification: G32, M52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Korczak, Piotr and Liu, Xicheng, Do Executives Hold on to Equity-Linked Incentives? The Role of Minimum Shareholding Policies (July 31, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2105647 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2105647
By Kevin Murphy