Personalistic Leadership, Party Politics, and the Quality of Democracy: The Case of Italy
16 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2012 Last revised: 31 Jul 2012
Date Written: July 26, 2012
Italian political history is not characterized by the appearance of major political leaders. Only exceptionally have few leadership figures, such as the Risorgimento hero Giuseppe Garibaldi, played a significant and widely praised role. Others, especially Benito Mussolini, have characterized an authoritarian regime, therefore contributing to the general distrust of powerful leaders. This paper explores which have been and are the cultural and institutional obstacles to the emergence of powerful leaders. The most important cultural obstacle can be found in the widely shared anti-political sentiment. In the post-Second World War period, the prevailing attitude of dislike of strong leaders was jointly exhibited by both major parties, the Christian Democrats and the Communists. This dislike was institutionalized in the Italian Constitution that provides for a traditional model of weak parliamentary government. In spite of Silvio Berlusconi’s emphasis on his personal leadership qualities, or perhaps exactly because of his extreme personalization, distrust toward possibly dominant political leaders remains widespread. Its consequences do not seem to be positive for the quality of Italian democracy.
Keywords: leadership, personalization, tyrant, parliamentary government, quality of democracy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation