Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court Revisited
16 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2012
Date Written: July 15, 2012
We reevaluate the influence of amici curiae on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari. Using expanded data on four representative Court terms, we find that at the same time that the number of amicus filings on certiorari have grown -- and perhaps owing to it -- the influence of those briefs on the probability of the Court granting certiorari has steadily declined between 1968 and 2007. In addition, we find that the positive influence of briefs in opposition to certiorari noted in some earlier work appears to be an artifact of a particular Term. Among other things, these findings hold implications for the extent to which case selection effects might bias empirical scholarship on the Supreme Court.
Keywords: Supreme Court, certiorari, agenda-setting, amici curiae, judicial politics
JEL Classification: K49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Organized Interests Before the Supreme Court: Setting the Agenda
Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court
By Chris W. Bonneau, Thomas H. Hammond, ...
Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence
By Ryan C. Black and Ryan J. Owens
The Discuss List and Agenda-Setting on the Supreme Court
By Ryan Schoen and Paul J. Wahlbeck
Twisted Roots: Cointegrated Explanations of Transformation within the Federal Judicial Appointment Process
Extreme Dissensus: Explaining Plurality Decisions on the United States Supreme Court
By Pamela C. Corley, Udi Sommer, ...
Disagreement All Around: The Role of Dissents to Denials of Certiorari