Footnotes (20)



Can Law and Literature Be Practical? The Crucible and the Federal Rules of Evidence

Martin H. Pritikin

Whittier Law School

July 16, 2012

West Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming

Counter-intuitively, one of the best ways to learn the practice-oriented topic of evidence may be by studying a work of fiction — specifically, Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, which dramatizes the 17th century Salem witch trials. The play puts the reader in the position of legal advocate, and invites strategic analysis of evidentiary issues. A close analysis of the dialogue presents an opportunity to explore both the doctrinal nuances of and policy considerations underlying the most important topics covered by the Federal Rules of Evidence, including relevance, character evidence and impeachment, opinion testimony, hearsay, and the mode and order of interrogation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Arthur Miller, Crucible, evidence, law and literature

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Pritikin, Martin H., Can Law and Literature Be Practical? The Crucible and the Federal Rules of Evidence (July 16, 2012). West Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2110294

Contact Information

Martin H. Pritikin (Contact Author)
Whittier Law School ( email )
3333 Harbor Blvd.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 746
Downloads: 100
Download Rank: 212,030
Footnotes:  20
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Modernism and the Critique of Law and Literature
By Desmond Manderson