Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Meat Animals, Humane Standards, & Other Legal Fictions

Law, Culture & Humanities, 2012

12 Pages Posted: 18 Jul 2012  

David N. Cassuto

Pace University - School of Law

Date Written: July 17, 2012

Abstract

Law and food are distinct concepts, though the discipline (Law and Food) implies a relationship worthy of study. The conjunction (“and”) creates meaning. However, its absence also conveys meaning. For example, “meat animal” suggests that animals can be both meat and animal. This conflation has powerful legal implications. National Meat Association v. Harris (2012) makes chillingly plain the law’s indifference to whether a meat animal is alive or dead. This essay examines the way supposedly humane federal practices ignore the systematic brutalization of “food animals” as those animals get processed into marketable flesh. It concludes with some observations about why this legal blindness exists.

Keywords: National Meat Association v. Harris, humane standards, meat animal, industrial agriculture, National Meat Inspection Act, preemption, Supreme Court, law & food, food law, animal law

JEL Classification: D18, H51, K10, K19, K23, K30, K32, K39, L66, L79, N50, Q10, Q18, Q28, R38, Z00

Suggested Citation

Cassuto, David N., Meat Animals, Humane Standards, & Other Legal Fictions (July 17, 2012). Law, Culture & Humanities, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2111455

David Cassuto (Contact Author)

Pace University - School of Law ( email )

78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
392
Rank
63,285
Abstract Views
1,798