Why In Re Omegas Group Was Right: An Essay on the Legal Status of Equitable Remedies
14 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2012
Date Written: 2011
Abstract
This article is part of a symposium on the new Restatement (Third) or Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. I take up the problem of constructive trusts in bankruptcy. The Restatement takes the position that constructive trust claimants have automatic priority in insolvency situations over ordinary creditors. I argue that this unduly reifies a remedial construct that is useful for capturing unjust enrichment but does not always do so in cases of insolvency.
Keywords: Constructive Trust, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sherwin, Emily L., Why In Re Omegas Group Was Right: An Essay on the Legal Status of Equitable Remedies (2011). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2012, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-54, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2115586
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.