Exploitation, Vulnerability, and Social Domination

Philosophy and Public Affairs, Forthcoming

22 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2012 Last revised: 13 Mar 2013

Nicholas Vrousalis

Leiden University - Institute of Political Science

Date Written: March 12, 2013

Abstract

This essay attempts to revive a research programme by criticizing it. Its object of criticism is the powerful research agenda of analytical Marxism. I shall attempt this revival by criticizing the views of two of the most influential members of that research programme, G. A. Cohen and John Roemer. I will argue that they are mistaken in their identification of exploitation with exchange against the background of injustice in the distribution of assets. Exploitation should be conceived, instead, as a form of domination, that is, domination for self-enrichment. The latter conception, I shall argue, captures intuitions surplus to the analytical Marxist view, accords better with Marx’s own critique of capitalism, provides a richer, and more plausible, understanding of socialist goals, is more amenable to integration into a rigorous Marxist social science, and brings Marxism closer to radical democracy. If I am right, then the idea of exploitation will have received a new lease of life, and the Marxist armoury will have been enriched by renewed focus on vulnerability and domination.

Keywords: exploitation, marxism, equality, G. A. Cohen, John Roemer

JEL Classification: B14, B24, E11, P16, P41

Suggested Citation

Vrousalis, Nicholas, Exploitation, Vulnerability, and Social Domination (March 12, 2013). Philosophy and Public Affairs, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2118772 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2118772

Nicholas Vrousalis (Contact Author)

Leiden University - Institute of Political Science ( email )

Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences
PO Box 9555
Leiden, 2300 RB
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
409
rank
65,409
Abstract Views
1,562
PlumX