Audit Quality and Auditor Reputation: Evidence from Japan
49 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2012
There are 2 versions of this paper
Audit Quality and Auditor Reputation: Evidence from Japan
Date Written: July 27, 2012
Abstract
We study events surrounding ChuoAoyama’s failed audit of Kanebo, a large Japanese cosmetics company whose management engaged in a massive accounting fraud. ChuoAoyama was PwC’s Japanese affiliate and one of Japan’s largest audit firms. In May 2006, the Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) suspended ChuoAoyama for two months for its role in the Kanebo fraud. This unprecedented action followed a series of events that seriously damaged ChuoAoyama’s reputation. We use these events to provide evidence on the importance of auditors’ reputation for quality in a setting where litigation plays essentially no role. Around one quarter of ChuoAoyama’s clients defected from the firm after its suspension, consistent with the importance of reputation. Larger firms and those with greater growth options were more likely to leave, also consistent with the reputation argument.
Keywords: Audit quality, auditor reputation, Japan
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Who Cares About Auditor Reputation?
By Jan Barton
-
Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals
By Ray Ball
-
Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals
By Ray Ball
-
The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review Program
By Clive S. Lennox and Gilles Hilary
-
Competition for Andersen's Clients
By Mark J. Kohlbeck, Brian W. Mayhew, ...
-
By Karen K. Nelson, Richard A. Price, ...