The Move to Counter the Move to Counter Fair Use

17 Pages Posted: 30 Jul 2012

See all articles by Bruce Abramson

Bruce Abramson

Charles River Associates, Inc.

Date Written: August 15, 2005


“Fair use” has two meanings. In its colloquial guise, most people who buy books, CDs, DVDs, software, or consumer goods think that it is only “fair” for them to be able to use their purchases however they choose, and that it would be “unfair” for the manufacturer to prohibit noncommercial use. In its technical guise, fair use is a copyright law doctrine that mirrors the colloquial conception quite imperfectly. As technology enables consumers to engage in new and exciting activities with the information products that they purchase, the intuitive colloquial notion of “fair use” expands — increasingly often in ways that appear to contradict the copyright laws. Congress responded to this expansion in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA). The DMCA explicitly prohibits “circumvention,” or the disabling of a technological solution that a copyright owner put in place to “control access” to the copyrighted product. The DMCA also reopened the discussion of numerous issues related to third-party liability for copyright infringement. Both of these issues have proved critical in the recent battles among copyright holders, technologists, and the public.

Suggested Citation

Abramson, Bruce, The Move to Counter the Move to Counter Fair Use (August 15, 2005). TPRC 2005, Available at SSRN:

Bruce Abramson (Contact Author)

Charles River Associates, Inc. ( email )

1201 F Street, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, DC 20004-1204
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics