The Institution Matching Canon

Aziz Z. Huq

University of Chicago - Law School

July 2012

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 2, 2012
U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 394

This Article identifies and analyzes a transsubstantive tool of constitutional doctrine that to date has escaped scholarly attention. The Article terms this device the “institution matching” canon. It can be stated briefly as follows: When the government makes a decision that may impinge upon a liberty or equality interest — which may or may not be directly judicially enforced otherwise — a court should determine whether the component of government that made the decision has actual competence in and responsibility for the policy justifications invoked to curtail the interest. If not, the court should reject the government action but leave open the possibility of a “do-over” by a more appropriate component of government. First identified in an early written opinion of Justice John Paul Stevens, the institution matching canon continues to play an important if imperfectly articulated role in criminal law, administrative law, and national security doctrine. This Article provides a systematic survey of the ways that the Court has employed institution matching and develops a taxonomy of the canon’s costs and benefits.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 31, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Huq, Aziz Z., The Institution Matching Canon (July 2012). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 106, No. 2, 2012; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 394. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2120744

Contact Information

Aziz Z. Huq (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 514
Downloads: 79
Download Rank: 235,422