Up from Gideon

Donald A. Dripps

University of San Diego School of Law

July 31, 2012

Texas Tech Law Review, Forthcoming

This essay, based on an address delivered at the Sixth Annual Texas Tech Criminal Law Symposium, explores the paradox of Gideon v. Wainwright and suggests some new directions for improving defense of the indigent against criminal charges. The paradox of Gideon lies in the widespread agreement (1) that Gideon was a great decision; (2) that from a formal perspective, the Sixth Amendment’s text and history provide scant support for Gideon’s adoption of the Zerbst rule requiring appointment for all indigent defendants in felony cases; and (3) that from a functional perspective, Gideon has not led to effective representation for all defendants. If almost no one thinks Gideon was required by text and history, and if almost no one thinks Gideon has delivered effective representation, why does almost everyone love Gideon?

Reforms are put forward for discussion. These include (1) exempting some self-representing felony defendants, like their misdemeanor counterparts, from sentences of incarceration if convicted; (2) giving counsel for indigent defendants discretion to decline unpromising appeals; (3) permitting lay representation of juvenile and misdemeanor defendants; and (4) recognizing indigent defense as a separate career track from the general practice of law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Gideon v. Wainwright, Sixth Amendment, right to counsel, indigent defense

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 31, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dripps, Donald A., Up from Gideon (July 31, 2012). Texas Tech Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2120782

Contact Information

Donald A. Dripps (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 456
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 254,066