Are International Judges Afraid of Science?: A Comment on Mbengue

19 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2012

See all articles by José E. Alvarez

José E. Alvarez

New York University School of Law

Date Written: August 3, 2012

Abstract

This article considers and critiques the proposition that international adjudicators are afraid or avoid determinations of scientific fact because of their discomfort with the technical expertise involved or the probabilistic judgments required of such fact-finding. It argues that this contention ignores the endemic fact-finding challenges faced by international tribunals generally, that the uncertainties attributed to “scientific” evidence are actually prevalent throughout the judicial process, that adjudicators are actually quite familiar with probabilistic judgments, and that structural constraints on courts and arbitrators and adjudicators’ own backgrounds affect how well fact-finding occurs, irrespective of whether it involves science. Finally, it suggests that to the extent international judges and arbitrators avoid confronting and answering head-on facts subject to scientific proof this may actually be a good thing.

Suggested Citation

Alvarez, José Enrique, Are International Judges Afraid of Science?: A Comment on Mbengue (August 3, 2012). Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 34, 2012; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-36. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2123390

José Enrique Alvarez (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
136
Abstract Views
899
rank
211,819
PlumX Metrics