A Long View of the Senate's Influence over Supreme Court Appointments

Christine Kexel Chabot

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

May 1, 2013

64 Hastings Law Journal 1229, May 2013

This Article offers the first empirical analysis of the Senate’s role in constraining presidents' choices of Supreme Court nominees over an extended historical period. It considers ideologies of Senates faced by nominating presidents and measures whether the ideologies of these Senates predict Justices' voting behavior. The analysis substantially qualifies earlier understandings of senatorial constraint.

Earlier empirical studies consider only limited numbers of recent nominees. They suggest that the Senate has constrained presidents' choices, and many scholars theorize that the Senate has enhanced its role in the appointments process since the 1950s. Analysis of a larger group of nominees shows that the Senate’s ideology has had significant predictive power over Justices' votes in only two isolated historical periods. Senatorial ideology was last significant in the 1970s, shortly after the filibuster of Abe Fortas's nomination to be Chief Justice, but then it lost significance following rejection of Robert Bork’s nomination in 1987.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: Supreme Court, appointments, Senate, president, law and politics

JEL Classification: K40

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 10, 2012 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Chabot, Christine Kexel, A Long View of the Senate's Influence over Supreme Court Appointments (May 1, 2013). 64 Hastings Law Journal 1229, May 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2126887 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2126887

Contact Information

Christine Kexel Chabot (Contact Author)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 983
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 115,781
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. What Privacy Is For
By Julie Cohen