Implementing a Multidimensional Poverty Measure Using Mixed Methods and a Participatory Framework

34 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2012 Last revised: 24 Aug 2014

See all articles by Sophie Mitra

Sophie Mitra

Fordham University

Kristine Jones

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI)

Brandon C. Vick

Indiana University of Pennsylvania

David Brown

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI)

Eileen McGinn

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI)

Mary Jane Alexander

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI)

Date Written: May 1, 2011

Abstract

Recently, there have been advances in the development of multidimensional poverty measures. Work is needed however on how to implement such measures. This paper deals with the process of selecting dimensions and setting weights in multidimensional poverty measurement using qualitative and quantitative methods in a participatory framework. We estimate the multidimensional poverty measures developed by Alkire and Foster for a particular group: persons with psychiatric diagnoses in the United States. To select relevant dimensions and their relative ordering, two discussion groups are convened: one consisting of persons with lived-experience expertise and the other consisting of people with mental health service provision or research expertise. Several methods are used to convert dimension rankings into weights.

The selection and ordering of dimensions differed between the two discussion groups, as did the resulting poverty measures. For instance, the poverty headcount using the dimensions and weights of the ‘lived experience’ group ranged from 20.61% to 26.96% as compared to a range of 18.62% to 33.19% using those of the ‘provider/researcher’ group. One of the main results of this study is that the Alkire Foster method is sensitive to the selection of dimensions and the methods used to derive rankings and weights. It points toward the limitation of relying exclusively on small scale qualitative methods for the selection and ranking of dimensions. In addition, the participatory framework used in this study was found to be essential in interpreting results, in particular with respect to the limitations of the data set in measuring relevant dimensions.

Keywords: Multidimensional Poverty, Mixed Methods, Participatory Research, Mental Health

Suggested Citation

Mitra, Sophie and Jones, Kristine and Vick, Brandon C. and Brown, David and McGinn, Eileen and Alexander, Mary Jane, Implementing a Multidimensional Poverty Measure Using Mixed Methods and a Participatory Framework (May 1, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2127595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2127595

Sophie Mitra (Contact Author)

Fordham University ( email )

441 East Fordham road
Bronx, NY 10458
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.fordham.edu/economics/mitra

Kristine Jones

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI) ( email )

Orangeburg, NY 10962
United States

Brandon C. Vick

Indiana University of Pennsylvania ( email )

Indiana, PA 15705
United States

David Brown

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI) ( email )

Orangeburg, NY 10962
United States

Eileen McGinn

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI) ( email )

Orangeburg, NY 10962
United States

Mary Jane Alexander

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI) ( email )

Orangeburg, NY 10962
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
1,378
rank
268,577
PlumX Metrics