Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Positivism and Predisposition: The Forgotten Foundations of the Entrapment Doctrine

37 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2012 Last revised: 6 Oct 2013

T. Ward Frampton

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

For the past eighty years, the entrapment doctrine has provided a legal defense for those facing federal prosecution, but only for those defendants lacking criminal “predisposition” prior to the government’s inducement. The peculiar contours of this doctrine have generated significant/academic debate, yet this scholarship has failed to explain why the entrapment doctrine developed as it did in the first instance. This Article addresses this gap by examining competing views on criminality and punishment in America during the doctrine’s emergence, highlighting the significant (though largely forgotten) impact of positivist criminology on the early twentieth-century legal imagination. Though positivism has long since been discredited as a criminological school, positivist theory helped shape the entrapment doctrine, and this intellectual context helps explain several features of the modern defense that have puzzled legal scholars. Unraveling these forgotten theoretical underpinnings thus provides a novel historical perspective on the modern doctrine’s formation, but it also offers a path forward for entrapment law today.

Suggested Citation

Frampton, T. Ward, Positivism and Predisposition: The Forgotten Foundations of the Entrapment Doctrine (2013). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2127646 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2127646

T. Ward Frampton (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Rank
230,849
Abstract Views
675