Death and Rehabilitation

Meghan J. Ryan

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

August 11, 2012

SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 112
46 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 101 (2013)

While rehabilitation is reemerging as an important penological goal, the Supreme Court is eroding the long-revered divide between capital and non-capital sentences. This raises the question of whether and how rehabilitation applies in the capital context. Courts and scholars have long concluded that it does not — that death is completely irrelevant to rehabilitation. Yet, historically, the death penalty in this country has been imposed in large part to induce the rehabilitation of offenders’ characters. Additionally, there are tales of the worst offenders transforming their characters when they are facing death, and several legal doctrines are based on the idea that death spurs rehabilitation.

Courts’ and scholars’ conclusion that death is irrelevant to rehabilitation likely stems from changes in our understanding of rehabilitation. While it was once understood as referring to an offender’s character transformation, references to rehabilitation now often focus on offenders’ direct impacts on society. This has the effect, though, of distracting from the humanness of the worst offenders and consequently not providing them with true opportunities to transform their characters — a denial which challenges the Eighth Amendment’s focus on respecting the human dignity of the condemned.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: death penalty, capital punishment, death, rehabilitation, Eighth Amendment, dignity, Miller v. Alabama, dying declaration, habeas corpus, reformation, repentance, Karla Faye Tucker, death is different, Stanley Tookie Williams III, Paul Crump

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 12, 2012 ; Last revised: June 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Ryan, Meghan J., Death and Rehabilitation (August 11, 2012). SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 112. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2128175 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2128175

Contact Information

Meghan J. Ryan (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,982
Downloads: 315
Download Rank: 74,630