China and the Future of International Adjudication

Maryland Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, No. 154 (2012)

Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-17

27 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2012  

Julian Ku

Hofstra University - School of Law

Date Written: August 14, 2012

Abstract

Traditionally, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has shunned participation in international adjudication, preferring to settle all disputes through direct negotiations. But in the past two decades, this wholly negative approach to international courts and arbitration tribunals has begun to shift. In addition to the acceptance and active participation in the Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization, the PRC has also accepted limited jurisdiction for arbitration under the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Despite this shift, the PRC still follows a policy of strictly limiting its exposure to international adjudicatory mechanisms. This strategy, which is similar to that practiced by the United States, suggests that international adjudication faces difficult prospects in the long term.

Keywords: international law, international courts

JEL Classification: K10, K33

Suggested Citation

Ku, Julian, China and the Future of International Adjudication (August 14, 2012). Maryland Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, No. 154 (2012); Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2129217

Julian G. Ku (Contact Author)

Hofstra University - School of Law ( email )

121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-4237 (Phone)
516-463-6264 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
207
Rank
118,800
Abstract Views
1,135