A Behavioral Justification for Escalating Punishment Schemes

20 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2012 Last revised: 3 Dec 2015

See all articles by Murat C. Mungan

Murat C. Mungan

Texas A&M University School of Law

Date Written: June 8, 2015

Abstract

The standard two-period law enforcement model is considered in a setting where individuals rarely lose self-control or commit crime without first comparing expected costs and benefits. Where escalating punishment schemes are present, there is an inherent value in keeping a clean criminal record; a person with a record may unintentionally become a repeat offender if he fails to exert self-control, and be punished more severely. If the punishment for repeat offenders is sufficiently high, one may rationally forgo the opportunity of committing a profitable crime today to avoid being sanctioned as a repeat offender in the future. Therefore, partial deterrence can be achieved at a very low cost through the use of escalating penalties, providing a behavioral justification for punishing repeat offenders more severely.

Keywords: Lapse, weak will, repeat offenders, law enforcement, deterrence, escalating penalties

JEL Classification: D03, K00, K10, K14, K40, K42

Suggested Citation

Mungan, Murat C., A Behavioral Justification for Escalating Punishment Schemes (June 8, 2015). 37 International Review of Law and Economics 189 (2014), FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 602, FSU College of Law, Law, Business & Economics Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2130847 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2130847

Murat C. Mungan (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
Abstract Views
1,507
Rank
337,160
PlumX Metrics