Competence of Common Courts in Poland in Competition Matters

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Vol. 5, No. 6, p. 57, 2012

15 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2012  

Aleksander Stawicki

WKB Wierciński, Kwieciński, Baehr

Date Written: August 16, 2012

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to present current judicial practice, concerning hearing cases stemming from appeals of Polish Competition Authority decisions. The relevant court tends to review the cases only on merits, omitting to address procedural infringements, clearly stated by the parties in appeals. In author’s opinion this common practice does not have a legal leg to stand on. Author analyses relevant laws and precedents pointing out, that full review of the decision is Court’s duty, which could not be neglected. Furthermore, according to ECHR rulings procedural guaranties should be assured on high level, especially in matters, where quasi-criminal fines are concerned. As a legal practitioner Author perceives possible crippling effect on effectiveness, assuming that the Court would have to review all steps of the proceedings before Competition Authority. So in conclusion Author proposes a compromise solution asserting, that the Court should at least address all procedural infringement counts stated in appeal.

Keywords: antitrust proceedings, competition, judicial review, National Competition Authority, fines, due course of law, procedural safeguards, procedural infringements

Suggested Citation

Stawicki, Aleksander, Competence of Common Courts in Poland in Competition Matters (August 16, 2012). Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, Vol. 5, No. 6, p. 57, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2130856

Aleksander Stawicki (Contact Author)

WKB Wierciński, Kwieciński, Baehr ( email )

Poland

Paper statistics

Downloads
24
Abstract Views
240