Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act

6 Pages Posted: 17 Aug 2012 Last revised: 25 Dec 2013

James Ming Chen

Michigan State University - College of Law

Date Written: November 22, 2011

Abstract

In a pivotal antitrust decision, Cellular South, Inc. v. AT&T Inc., 821 F. Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. These suits posed a significant barrier to the merger of AT&T and T-Mobile. The ability of Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their claims represents a modest but important victory against the domination of the American wireless industry by an emerging AT&T/Verizon duopoly.

Keywords: antitrust, mergers, Clayton Act, AT&T, T-Mobile, telecommunications

Suggested Citation

Chen, James Ming, Merger to Monopsony: AT&T, T-Mobile, and the Clayton Act (November 22, 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2130962 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2130962

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)

Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
170
Rank
149,033
Abstract Views
1,362