Keeping 'Reasonable Grounds' Meaningful

80 CR (6th) 73, 2011

8 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2012

See all articles by Steve Coughlan

Steve Coughlan

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law

Date Written: 2011


Two recent Court of Appeal cases (R. v. Jir and R. v. Bush, both reported ante, pp. 53 and 29) are examples of tendencies in some recent decisions to weaken the "reasonable grounds" standard for arrest. That the reasonable grounds standard for arrest is important is beyond question. As the Supreme Court of Canada has said,

Without such an important standard, even the most democratic society could all too easily fall prey to the abuses and excesses of a police state.

In subtle and sometimes unintentional ways, however, the reasonable ground standard is being undermined. This short article will examine two ways in which this can be seen: in the approach to what level of certainty the standard entails, and in the approach to how the objective aspect of the standard can be proven. Both Jir and Bush are relevant to each of these issues.

Keywords: standard of proof, reasonable grounds, arrest, R v Jir, R v Bush

Suggested Citation

Coughlan, Steve, Keeping 'Reasonable Grounds' Meaningful (2011). 80 CR (6th) 73, 2011, Available at SSRN:

Steve Coughlan (Contact Author)

Dalhousie University - Schulich School of Law ( email )

6061 University Avenue
6061 University Ave
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H9

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics