Dealing with Dictators: Negotiated Democratization and the Fate of Outgoing Autocrats

International Studies Quarterly, 58, no. 3 (2014).

46 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2012 Last revised: 4 Feb 2015

Michael Albertus

University of Chicago - Department of Political Science

Victor A. Menaldo

University of Washington - Department of Political Science

Date Written: August 22, 2012

Abstract

This paper examines how the circumstances of democratic transition affect the consequences of losing office for outgoing dictators. Using data on constitutional origins and democratization from 1875-2004, we find that outgoing dictators who are able to retain a holdover constitution through democratization and beyond are less likely to face severe punishment upon relinquishing their rule. These results hold after accounting for alternative explanations of autocrats' post-tenure fate and after using instrumental variables to adjust for potential endogeneity. We also document several mechanisms by which this occurs: proportional representation, the election of right-wing executives, post-transition military influence, and elite control over local politics. The findings suggest that for dictators who fear their ousting in the face of domestic unrest or potential instability, democracy can provide a plausible avenue for protecting their most basic interests.

Suggested Citation

Albertus, Michael and Menaldo, Victor A., Dealing with Dictators: Negotiated Democratization and the Fate of Outgoing Autocrats (August 22, 2012). International Studies Quarterly, 58, no. 3 (2014).. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2133784 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2133784

Michael Albertus

University of Chicago - Department of Political Science ( email )

Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Victor A. Menaldo (Contact Author)

University of Washington - Department of Political Science ( email )

101 Gowen Hall
Box 353530
Seattle, WA 98195
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
275
Rank
90,221
Abstract Views
1,352