Posted: 23 Aug 2012
Date Written: 2012
Many private common carriers or regulated utilities have eminent domain powers in the U.S. The rationale resembles that for local governments; lower cost of assembling land for long distance electric transmission, gas and oil products pipelines, etc. Recent court cases raise questions about whether eminent domain allows firms to use inefficiently long indirect land corridors, inefficiently wide corridors, or higher value land when lower value land is available as an alternative? Despite the incentive to overuse capital under rate-of-return regulation, it turns out that the firm adopts an excessive land corridor width only to the extent that corridor width is tied to capital usage. For route selection, rate-of-return regulated firms follow the same Pareto rule that would be followed by an efficiency-oriented government when designating which land to take for a transmission route by eminent domain.
Keywords: Private eminent domain, Public use, Regulated firm
JEL Classification: K11, R14, R38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Turnbull, Geoffrey K., Delegating Eminent Domain Powers to Private Firms: Land Use and Efficiency Implications (2012). Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2134984