Where You Sit is Where You Stand: Policy Preferences in the Czechoslovak Transition

Dalibor Rohac

Legatum Institute; King's College London

August 16, 2012

This paper shows that systematic differences in policy preferences existed between Czechs and Slovaks in the early 1990s. In spite of having lived in the same institutional environment for almost 75 years and in spite of being subjected to the same policy shocks in that period, the Czechs displayed significantly stronger pro-market attitudes than the Slovaks. Those differences are not explained by a variation in ‘collective memory’ of the pre-communist era, differences in the levels of economic development before communism, differences in religiosity, legal origins or past institutions. To a large extent, however, the differences in policy preferences can be accounted for by the expected costs of transition in different areas of Czechoslovakia. In particular, the unemployment rate in 1994, after the core of the economic reforms had been adopted, accounts for almost one half of the differences in market-related policy preferences between Czechs and Slovaks in the early phases of the transition. It seems therefore that the variation in expectations about whether particular regions were likely to be winners or losers of the transition affected individual preferences over policy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Policy preferences, Transition, Self-serving bias

JEL Classification: P52, D02

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 25, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Rohac, Dalibor, Where You Sit is Where You Stand: Policy Preferences in the Czechoslovak Transition (August 16, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2135570 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2135570

Contact Information

Dalibor Rohac (Contact Author)
Legatum Institute ( email )
11 Charles Street
Mayfair, London, London W1J 5DW
United Kingdom
King's College London ( email )
London, England WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom
07585303666 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 340
Downloads: 59
Download Rank: 289,485