Loneliness in the Crowd: Why Nobody Wants Opt-Out Class Members to Assert Offensive Issue Preclusion Against Class Defendants

58 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2012 Last revised: 5 Mar 2015

Antonio Gidi

Syracuse University College of Law

Date Written: August 31, 2012

Abstract

This Article addresses the ability of members who have opted out of a class action to assert offensive nonmutual issue preclusion in their individual lawsuit against the class defendant. It discusses the reasons why the use of this device, widely available to any nonparty, has been systematically denied to opt-out class members. Specifically, their interests are not protected by the traditional actors in class action litigation: neither the court, the defendant, nor the class counsel represent their concerns and interests. Against the prevailing case law, scholarship, and the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation, Professor Gidi concludes that opt-out class members should be allowed to assert offensive nonmutual issue preclusion against the class defendant as any nonparty.

Keywords: Class Actions, Opt Out, Preclusion, Issue Preclusion, Res Judicata

JEL Classification: K41

Suggested Citation

Gidi, Antonio, Loneliness in the Crowd: Why Nobody Wants Opt-Out Class Members to Assert Offensive Issue Preclusion Against Class Defendants (August 31, 2012). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 66, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2139240

Antonio Gidi (Contact Author)

Syracuse University College of Law ( email )

Syracuse, NY 13244-1030
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.gidi.com.br

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Rank
133,274
Abstract Views
829