Capital Income, Risky Investments, and Income and Cash-Flow Taxation

52 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2013 Last revised: 7 Sep 2013

Date Written: September 4, 2013

Abstract

It has become conventional wisdom, based partly on postulated portfolio adjustments by investors in risky assets, (1) to view an income tax as equivalent to a tax levied only on the risk free return to capital and as therefore equivalent to a wealth tax; and (2) to view the difference between an income tax and a cash-flow consumption tax as limited to tax on the risk free return. I show that the propositions (1) equating an income tax to a tax on the risk free return, and (2) distinguishing an income tax from a cash-flow tax only by tax on the risk free return, are distinct. Drawing on the literature on optimal responses to taxation by holders of risky assets I show also that the postulated adjustments on which the second of those propositions depends entail implausible assumptions about behavior under uncertainty, and that the foundation for that claim is to that extent unsound. This in turn suggests that claims that the differences between income and cash flow taxation are minor should be treated with caution.

Keywords: Taxation and Risk, Uncertainty, Portfolio Choice, Cash-Flow Taxation

JEL Classification: D80, G11, H20, H21, H24, H25, K34

Suggested Citation

Sims, Theodore S., Capital Income, Risky Investments, and Income and Cash-Flow Taxation (September 4, 2013). Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-45, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2139389 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2139389

Theodore S. Sims (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
172
Abstract Views
1,807
Rank
371,316
PlumX Metrics