Evaluating Growth Volatility Susceptibility within Regional Free Trade Agreements

International Journal of Finance and Economics, 16(1), 32-40, 2011

20 Pages Posted: 5 Sep 2012 Last revised: 31 Jan 2014

See all articles by Jeffrey Edwards

Jeffrey Edwards

North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

Vance Ginn

Ginn Economic Consulting

Date Written: September 4, 2012

Abstract

This paper looks at the effects on trading partners that are included and not included in a Regional Free Trade Agreement (RFTA). Using the system GMM methodology, we consider six control variables to determine whether the volatility is more pronounced in non-RFTA countries (Type 1) or countries that are RFTA trading partners (Type 2). The results are three-fold: 1. whether a country is in an agreement or not there is statistically significant volatility spillover from trading partner economies, 2. being in a RFTA does not insulate oneself from non-RFTA countries, and 3. participating in a RFTA actually increases susceptibility to volatility from other RFTA countries. We conclude that it may be more harmful to be in a RFTA because of the increase in volatility exposure among trading partners relative to not joining a RFTA.

Keywords: Volatility, Development, GMM, RFTA

JEL Classification: O11, O16, O18, O19

Suggested Citation

Edwards, Jeffrey and Ginn, Vance, Evaluating Growth Volatility Susceptibility within Regional Free Trade Agreements (September 4, 2012). International Journal of Finance and Economics, 16(1), 32-40, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2141585

Jeffrey Edwards

North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University ( email )

1601 E. Market Street
Greensboro, NC 27411
United States

Vance Ginn (Contact Author)

Ginn Economic Consulting ( email )

TX 78681

HOME PAGE: http://www.vanceginn.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
31
Abstract Views
666
PlumX Metrics