Springtime for Freedom of Religion or Belief: Will Newly Democratic Arab States Guarantee International Human Rights Norms or Perpetuate Their Violation?

David Kirkham, ed., State Responses to Religious Minorities (Ashgate, 2013)

University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 195

Posted: 8 Sep 2012 Last revised: 9 Jun 2014

See all articles by Robert C. Blitt

Robert C. Blitt

University of Tennessee College of Law

Date Written: September 8, 2012

Abstract

The Arab Spring has generated unprecedented and seismic political and social upheaval across the Arab world. The reasons for the outbreak of widespread and vociferous public protest are myriad, but generally understood as including long-simmering resentment of government corruption and repression, underwhelming economic development, chronic unemployment and poor respect for human rights, including the treatment of individuals and groups affiliated with political manifestations of Islam. Despite the initial drama surrounding the street rallies, two years on, the pace of change has grown fitful and uncertain.

The purpose of this chapter is to consider one narrow aspect of the Arab Spring. Namely, what does this historic moment augur for securing the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief? Further to this question, how — if at all — have the emerging post-Arab Spring governments differentiated themselves from their predecessors on issues including non-discrimination, equality, freedom of expression and the rights of religious minorities — including Muslims dissenting from state-sanctioned Islam, non-Muslims, new religious movements (NRMs), and nonbelievers? And finally, what role, if any, should the larger international community play in advocating or facilitating the adoption of new constitutional and legislative safeguards designed to uphold international human rights norms?

In the end, this chapter argues that the revolutions hold the promise of correcting years of discriminatory and unequal treatment. However, such an outcome remains contingent upon overcoming a dangerous historical paradox that often finds formerly persecuted groups morphing into the role of persecutor. The direction emerging regimes tip will be determined by a combination of internal and external factors.

Keywords: Arab Spring, human rights, freedom of religion, religious freedom, Islam, defamation, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, United Nations, constitution, sharia

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K33, K39

Suggested Citation

Blitt, Robert C., Springtime for Freedom of Religion or Belief: Will Newly Democratic Arab States Guarantee International Human Rights Norms or Perpetuate Their Violation? (September 8, 2012). David Kirkham, ed., State Responses to Religious Minorities (Ashgate, 2013); University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 195. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2143681 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2143681

Robert C. Blitt (Contact Author)

University of Tennessee College of Law ( email )

1505 West Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, TN 37996
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.utk.edu/directory/robert-c-blitt

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
845
PlumX Metrics