In Good Times and in Bad: Defined-Benefit Pensions and Corporate Financial Policy

45 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2012 Last revised: 28 Oct 2017

See all articles by Söhnke M. Bartram

Söhnke M. Bartram

University of Warwick; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)

Date Written: January 3, 2017

Abstract

U.S. sponsors of defined-benefit pension plans integrate their pension plans into their overall financial management. Plan contributions are smaller and funding levels lower for plan sponsors that have less cash, are less profitable and are financially distressed. Moreover, plan sponsors make more aggressive pension plan assumptions if they have lower cash holdings and profit margins. While there is no evidence that plan sponsors generally take more risk with their pension plan as-sets if they have high business or financial risk, there is some evidence of risk shifting during major economic downturns such as the global financial crisis. As a result, funding rules, pension plan assumptions and investment policies are areas to consider for pension policy to protect plan beneficiaries.

Keywords: Pension plans, corporate finance, employer contributions, financial crisis, funding deficit, pension assumptions

JEL Classification: G3, F4, F3

Suggested Citation

Bartram, Söhnke M., In Good Times and in Bad: Defined-Benefit Pensions and Corporate Financial Policy (January 3, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2145261 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2145261

Söhnke M. Bartram (Contact Author)

University of Warwick ( email )

Warwick Business School
Finance Group
Coventry, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
+44 (24) 7657 4168 (Phone)
+1 425 952 1070 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/sbartram/

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) ( email )

London
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
247
Abstract Views
1,685
Rank
246,257
PlumX Metrics