In Good Times and in Bad: Defined-Benefit Pensions and Corporate Financial Policy
45 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2012 Last revised: 28 Oct 2017
Date Written: January 3, 2017
Abstract
U.S. sponsors of defined-benefit pension plans integrate their pension plans into their overall financial management. Plan contributions are smaller and funding levels lower for plan sponsors that have less cash, are less profitable and are financially distressed. Moreover, plan sponsors make more aggressive pension plan assumptions if they have lower cash holdings and profit margins. While there is no evidence that plan sponsors generally take more risk with their pension plan as-sets if they have high business or financial risk, there is some evidence of risk shifting during major economic downturns such as the global financial crisis. As a result, funding rules, pension plan assumptions and investment policies are areas to consider for pension policy to protect plan beneficiaries.
Keywords: Pension plans, corporate finance, employer contributions, financial crisis, funding deficit, pension assumptions
JEL Classification: G3, F4, F3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Investment and Financing Constraints: Evidence from the Funding of Corporate Pension Plans
-
Taxation and Corporate Pension Policy
By Irwin Tepper
-
Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions and Managerial Investment Decisions
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions and Managerial Investment Decisions
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Earnings Manipulation and Managerial Investment Decisions: Evidence from Sponsored Pension Plans
By Daniel Bergstresser, Joshua D. Rauh, ...
-
Funding and Asset Allocation in Corporate Pension Plans: an Empirical Investigation
By Zvi Bodie, Randall Morck, ...
-
Did Pension Plan Accounting Contribute to a Stock Market Bubble?