Geoengineering and Climate Management: From Marginality to Inevitablity

Jay Michaelson

Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Brown University - Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior

December 14, 2010

Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 221, Winter 2010

In 1998, when I wrote the first law review article advocating Geoengineering as a climate change mitigation strategy, Geoengineering was both unknown and unpopular. Twelve years later, the political economy of Geoengineering – or as I prefer to call it, Climate Management (CM) – has shifted, precisely because the conditions I outlined in 1998 have stayed so strikingly the same. Then, I argued that the lack of political will, absence, complexity, and sheer expense of climate change mitigation made meaningful preventive measures, i.e. cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, extremely difficult to undertake. After a decade of obfuscation and misinformation by powerful political actors, the case seems stronger than ever.

Today, while CM remains at the margins of our popular political discourse, there has been an explosion of scientific and policy analyses. Solar Radiation Management (SRM: increasing the concentration of sulfur dioxide in the upper atmosphere) and Ocean Iron Fertilization (OIF: seeding gigantic phytoplankton carbon sinks in the oceans by fertilizing them with iron) have both been explored and advanced by credible scientists, scholars, and even entrepreneurs. Additionally, CM has been tentatively explored by conservative think-tanks and pundits – to the horror of environmentalists.

Yet the mere fact that conservatives support Geoengineering should not, in itself, cause liberals and greens to oppose it. Supporting CM should give any environmentalist pause, both because of its riskiness and because so many of our political foes support it. But CM is a climate change strategy that, unlike regulation, might actually stand a chance of becoming reality. It is the only approach to climate change that can act as a compromise between liberals and libertarians, greens and browns. As climate change becomes ineluctable, geoengineeering becomes inevitable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: climate change, greenhouse effect, geoengineering, Newt Gingrich, Paul Crutzen, climate management, international law, environmental law

JEL Classification: K32, K33

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 16, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Michaelson, Jay, Geoengineering and Climate Management: From Marginality to Inevitablity (December 14, 2010). Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 221, Winter 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2146934

Contact Information

Jay Michaelson (Contact Author)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem ( email )
Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, IL 91905
Brown University - Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior ( email )
Providence, RI 02912
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,056
Downloads: 128
Download Rank: 176,770