Homo Economicus and Homo Stramineus

Prague Economic Papers, 24(2) 2015: 154-172.

Posted: 16 Sep 2012 Last revised: 23 Jul 2015

Marek Hudík

Xi'an Jiaotong University (XJTU) - International Business School Suzhou

Date Written: September 15, 2012

Abstract

The model of Homo economicus has often been criticized as unrealistic. In particular, it has been found lacking for allegedly assuming that people are selfish, an assumption which is contradicted by both introspection and empirical evidence. The aim of this paper is to show that never in the history of the economic discipline has selfishness constituted the core of the Homo economicus model. In fact, the standard economic model of behaviour which has been used by economists for more than a hundred years is reticent about the motives of behaviour. Critics thus do not criticize Homo economicus but a straw man – Homo stramineus. Three possible reasons for confusing Homo economicus with Homo stramineus are identified: malicious intent, ignorance and an attempt to avoid the tautological model of behaviour.

Keywords: Homo economicus, Self-interest, Desire of wealth, Utility, Rationality

JEL Classification: B12, B13, B21, B41, D01

Suggested Citation

Hudík, Marek, Homo Economicus and Homo Stramineus (September 15, 2012). Prague Economic Papers, 24(2) 2015: 154-172.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2147205 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2147205

Marek Hudik (Contact Author)

Xi'an Jiaotong University (XJTU) - International Business School Suzhou ( email )

111 Ren’ai Road,
Suzhou Lake Higher Education Town,
Suzhou, Jiangsu 215123
China

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
660