Fertility, Migration, and Altruism
35 Pages Posted: 5 May 2000 Last revised: 13 Feb 2023
Date Written: February 2000
Abstract
Consider migration to a higher income region as a human capital investment in which parents bear migration costs and children share returns. Migrants from a population with heterogeneous intergenerational discount rates will be self-selected on intergenerational altruism. Thus, immigrants may be self-selected on fertility. Soviet Jews who migrate to Israel despite high migration costs have significantly more children than members of the same birth cohort who migrate later when costs are low. We distinguish selection from treatment effects using a comparison group of women who migrate after childbearing age. We also find that immigrants favor bequests more and spend more time with their grandchildren in the U.S. Health and Retirement Survey. Selection on altruism can explain why historically immigrant-absorbing countries like the U.S. have higher fertility than other countries at comparable income levels. It provides an alternative explanation for Chiswick's classic earnings-overtaking result. Selection on altruism also implies that immigrant-absorbing regions will grow faster, or have higher per capita income, or both.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Labour Market Assimilation of Immigrants in Spain: Employment at the Expense of Bad Job-Matches?.
-
Are Migrants More Skilled than Non-Migrants? Repeat, Return and Same-Employer Migrants
-
Assimilation of Immigrants in Spain: A Longitudinal Analysis
By Mario Izquierdo, Aitor Lacuesta, ...
-
By Heather Antecol, Peter Kuhn, ...
-
The Self-Selection of Migrant Workers Revisited
By Eran Yashiv
-
The Effect of Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure on Recent Immigrants' Earnings
-
Self-Selection of Migrant Workers: Migration Premium and (No) Returns to Skills
By Eran Yashiv