Footnotes (30)



Does Geoengineering Present a Moral Hazard?

Albert Lin

University of California, Davis - School of Law

August 23, 2012

Ecology Law Quarterly, Forthcoming
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 312

Geoengineering, a set of unconventional, untested, and risky proposals for responding to climate change, has attracted growing attention in the wake of our collective failure so far to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Geoengineering research and deployment remain highly controversial, however, not only because of the risks involved, but also because of concern that geoengineering might undermine climate mitigation and adaptation efforts. The latter concern, often described as a moral hazard, has been questioned by some but not carefully explored. This article examines the critical question of whether geoengineering presents a moral hazard by drawing on empirical studies of moral hazard and risk compensation and on the psychology literature of heuristics and cultural cognition. The article finds it likely that geoengineering efforts will undermine mainstream strategies to combat climate change and suggests potential measures for ameliorating this moral hazard.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: geoengineering, climate change, moral hazard, risk compensation

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 26, 2012 ; Last revised: July 17, 2014

Suggested Citation

Lin, Albert, Does Geoengineering Present a Moral Hazard? (August 23, 2012). Ecology Law Quarterly, Forthcoming; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 312. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2152131

Contact Information

Albert Lin (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,656
Downloads: 342
Download Rank: 68,003
Footnotes:  30