Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Many Paths to Neutrality

Richard W. Garnett & Andrew Koppelman, "Introduction: The Many Paths to Neutrality," in First Amendment Stories (Foundation Press 2012), Garnett & Koppelman, eds

Northwestern Public Law Research Paper

Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-78

17 Pages Posted: 26 Sep 2012 Last revised: 16 Oct 2012

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This essay introduces a volume, First Amendment Stories, which the authors edited and to which a number of distinguished scholars contributed. The authors reflect on the tendency of First Amendment law to abstract away from specifics, and note that free-speech and religious-liberty law and doctrines generally aim for a certain kind of “neutrality”; in the interest of hitting that target, some considerations that are salient to ordinary common sense are deemed not to count. But, how is this neutrality possible? How does it ever happen that people embrace it? What specific contexts lead courts to abstract away from both specificity and context, to adopt positions that are neutral toward, say, theological truth and the viewpoint of speech? Is this move – this striving – toward neutrality justified, or justifiable? This question, the authors believe, runs through this volume and its chapters.

It turns out that, like “equality,” neutrality has a conventional meaning, one that, in many ways, can obscure the term’s contested, complicated, and multiple meanings. When it is not used merely to suggest a kind of serene nonjudgmentalism, the invocation of neutrality in conversations about law and politics is typically a shorthand gesture toward the generally understood value of removing some issues from political consideration, together with the arguments in favor of this removal. Such linguistic conventions are useful. The vague term “neutrality” may either introduce substantive argument or serve as a meaningful slogan in the many contexts in which it is difficult to develop arguments in a careful, systematic way. “Neutrality,” though, is a fluid term, as this volume’s several stories illustrate. It must take its shape from its container, the specific arguments in favor of withdrawing this or that substantive issue from politics.

Keywords: First Amendment, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, free exercise, establishment of religion, Constitutional Law, the Supreme Court, neutrality

JEL Classification: K49, K39, K19, K10

Suggested Citation

Garnett, Richard W. and Koppelman, Andrew, The Many Paths to Neutrality (2012). Richard W. Garnett & Andrew Koppelman, "Introduction: The Many Paths to Neutrality," in First Amendment Stories (Foundation Press 2012), Garnett & Koppelman, eds ; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper ; Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-78. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2152383

Richard W. Garnett (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

Room 327
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
574-631-6981 (Phone)
574-631-4197 (Fax)

Andrew M. Koppelman

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8431 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Rank
244,019
Abstract Views
670